[Image: Compass Rose] the social areas of cincinnati

<< Previous  Table of Contents  Next >>

Almost one Cincinnatian in five is over 60

 



Two thirds of neighborhoods with more than 20 percent elderly are in SES III and IV

 



The trend toward an increasingly greater proportion of our population being elderly will continue at least in a metropolitan context.

 



In 1990, nearly one half of the Cincinnati children were growing up in single parent families...  Nearly one third grew up in neighborhoods with concentrations of poverty...

 



In 2000, there were seven neighborhoods which had over 1,000 children.

 

Chapter 7

THE ELDERLY AND CHILDREN

 

The elderly can be looked at as a distinct subgroup of our population that has needs which often cut across lines of race and social class.  Most elderly people in an industrial society face the problem of how to spend their time in a constructive, fulfilling way.  When poverty and its accompanying lack of personal and neighborhood resources compound this crisis, life can become difficult indeed.  In this chapter we will consider the aged population as a specific target group which should be taken into account in the planning of services.  Further research is needed to identify the subgroups of this population whose needs are the most critical(1).  The main purpose here is to detail the geographic distribution of the population over 60 years of age.

 

Almost one Cincinnatian in five is over 60. 

During the 70s, the elderly population declined at a dramatically slower rate (9 percent) than the overall population (15 percent).  This trend toward an aging Cincinnati population reversed during the 1980s and the numbers for 1970 - 2000 show the city population declining by 26.9% and elderly population declining by 35 percent (Table 2d).  The percentage of the population that is elderly declined from 42 to 35 in SES I and II, the two lower SES quartiles, between 1970 and 2000.  In SES I only 15 percent of the population was over 60 in 2000.  Sixty percent of the elderly lived in SES III and IV in 2000.  Table 7a presents the percentage of seniors of the total population of each quartile.  Comparing 1970 and 2000's percentages show that the most notable change is the increase in elderly percentage in SES III, the upper middle quartile.

 

Table 7a

Trends in the Population Over 60 Years of Age

Social Area

Number of Persons
60 Years of Age and Older

Pct of Total Population
60 Yrs of Age and Older

 

1970

1980

1990

2000

1970

1980

1990

2000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quartile I

13,346

10,432

11,082

8,043

16%

14%

17%

15%

Quartile II

20,686

15,186

16,829

10,508

26%

21%

26%

20%

Quartile III

15,930

19,200

18,743

16,997

20%

27%

29%

32%

Quartile IV

31,075

27,212

18,674

17,323

38%

38%

29%

33%

Total

81,037

72,030

65,328

52,871

100%

100%

100%

100%

 

 



(Click to enlarge)


Table 7b

Cincinnati Neighborhoods' Changes in the Senior Population, 1970-1990

Neighborhood

Percent of Population

60 Years and Older

Percent
Change

Number of Persons 60 Years and Older

 

1970

1980

1990

2000

70-80

80-90

90-00

70-00

2000

QUARTILE 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fay Apartments

8%

5%

6%

6%

-39%

15%

0%

-30%

131

N. Fairmount - English Woods

11%

13%

10%

8%

19%

-17%

-2%

-20%

382

S. Cumminsville-Millvale

12%

13%

12%

11%

9%

-2%

-2%

-8%

412

Over-The-Rhine

20%

19%

11%

7%

-5%

-42%

-4%

-63%

561

Winton Hills

8%

13%

6%

9%

64%

-49%

3%

21%

495

Lower Price Hill

12%

13%

10%

8%

9%

-25%

-2%

-37%

90

Camp Washington

15%

15%

14%

8%

1%

-8%

-6%

-45%

130

West End

18%

17%

15%

15%

-4%

-11%

0%

-17%

1,182

S. Fairmount

21%

19%

13%

12%

-9%

-32%

-1%

-42%

407

Avondale

17%

22%

22%

19%

27%

3%

-4%

8%

3,021

Walnut Hills

24%

23%

21%

19%

-2%

-11%

-2%

-20%

1,449

Linwood

 ---

17%

22%

12%

 ---

24%

-9%

 ---

131

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

QUARTILE 2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sedamsville -Riverside

14%

16%

20%

21%

18%

25%

1%

53%

446

East Price Hill

17%

15%

14%

11%

-12%

-7%

-3%

-34%

2,032

Evanston

14%

22%

24%

19%

53%

12%

-6%

32%

1,508

Corryville

17%

14%

14%

10%

-22%

3%

-4%

-45%

369

East End

13%

15%

16%

14%

14%

3%

-1%

7%

234

Mt. Auburn

12%

14%

13%

11%

22%

-7%

-2%

-8%

683

Bond Hill

22%

17%

20%

22%

-19%

15%

2%

1%

518

Northside

20%

19%

17%

13%

-5%

-13%

-4%

-37%

1,187

Winton Place

14%

15%

14%

8%

5%

-7%

-5%

-39%

203

Carthage

21%

23%

21%

17%

11%

-11%

-3%

-17%

419

Mt. Airy

12%

12%

13%

14%

2%

9%

0%

15%

1,238

Fairview - Clifton Heights

19%

15%

9%

6%

-21%

-40%

-2%

-65%