Almost one Cincinnatian in five is over 60
|
|
Two thirds of neighborhoods with more than 20 percent elderly are in SES III and IV
|
|
The trend toward an increasingly greater proportion of our population being elderly will continue at least in a metropolitan context.
|
|
In 1990, nearly one half of the Cincinnati children were growing up in single parent families... Nearly one third grew up in neighborhoods with concentrations of poverty...
|
|
In 2000, there were seven neighborhoods which had over 1,000 children.
|
|
|
|
Chapter 7
THE ELDERLY AND CHILDREN
The elderly can be looked at as a distinct subgroup of our population that has needs which often cut across lines of race and social class. Most elderly people in an industrial society face the problem of how to spend their time in a constructive, fulfilling way. When poverty and its accompanying lack of personal and neighborhood resources compound this crisis, life can become difficult indeed. In this chapter we will consider the aged population as a specific target group which should be taken into account in the planning of services. Further research is needed to identify the subgroups of this population whose needs are the most critical(1). The main purpose here is to detail the geographic distribution of the population over 60 years of age.
Almost one Cincinnatian in five is over 60.
During the 70s, the elderly population declined at a dramatically slower rate (9 percent) than the overall population (15 percent). This trend toward an aging Cincinnati population reversed during the 1980s and the numbers for 1970 - 2000 show the city population declining by 26.9% and elderly population declining by 35 percent (Table 2d). The percentage of the population that is elderly declined from 42 to 35 in SES I and II, the two lower SES quartiles, between 1970 and 2000. In SES I only 15 percent of the population was over 60 in 2000. Sixty percent of the elderly lived in SES III and IV in 2000. Table 7a presents the percentage of seniors of the total population of each quartile. Comparing 1970 and 2000's percentages show that the most notable change is the increase in elderly percentage in SES III, the upper middle quartile.
Table 7a
Trends in the Population Over 60 Years of Age
|
Social Area
|
Number of Persons
60 Years of Age and Older
|
Pct of Total Population
60 Yrs of Age and Older
|
|
|
1970
|
1980
|
1990
|
2000
|
1970
|
1980
|
1990
|
2000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quartile I
|
13,346
|
10,432
|
11,082
|
8,043
|
16%
|
14%
|
17%
|
15%
|
|
Quartile II
|
20,686
|
15,186
|
16,829
|
10,508
|
26%
|
21%
|
26%
|
20%
|
|
Quartile III
|
15,930
|
19,200
|
18,743
|
16,997
|
20%
|
27%
|
29%
|
32%
|
|
Quartile IV
|
31,075
|
27,212
|
18,674
|
17,323
|
38%
|
38%
|
29%
|
33%
|
|
Total
|
81,037
|
72,030
|
65,328
|
52,871
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|

(Click to enlarge)
Table 7b
Cincinnati Neighborhoods' Changes in the Senior Population, 1970-1990
|
Neighborhood
|
Percent of Population
60 Years and Older
|
Percent
Change
|
Number of Persons 60 Years and Older
|
|
|
1970
|
1980
|
1990
|
2000
|
70-80
|
80-90
|
90-00
|
70-00
|
2000
|
|
QUARTILE 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fay Apartments
|
8%
|
5%
|
6%
|
6%
|
-39%
|
15%
|
0%
|
-30%
|
131
|
|
N. Fairmount - English Woods
|
11%
|
13%
|
10%
|
8%
|
19%
|
-17%
|
-2%
|
-20%
|
382
|
|
S. Cumminsville-Millvale
|
12%
|
13%
|
12%
|
11%
|
9%
|
-2%
|
-2%
|
-8%
|
412
|
|
Over-The-Rhine
|
20%
|
19%
|
11%
|
7%
|
-5%
|
-42%
|
-4%
|
-63%
|
561
|
|
Winton Hills
|
8%
|
13%
|
6%
|
9%
|
64%
|
-49%
|
3%
|
21%
|
495
|
|
Lower Price Hill
|
12%
|
13%
|
10%
|
8%
|
9%
|
-25%
|
-2%
|
-37%
|
90
|
|
Camp Washington
|
15%
|
15%
|
14%
|
8%
|
1%
|
-8%
|
-6%
|
-45%
|
130
|
|
West End
|
18%
|
17%
|
15%
|
15%
|
-4%
|
-11%
|
0%
|
-17%
|
1,182
|
|
S. Fairmount
|
21%
|
19%
|
13%
|
12%
|
-9%
|
-32%
|
-1%
|
-42%
|
407
|
Avondale
|
17%
|
22%
|
22%
|
19%
|
27%
|
3%
|
-4%
|
8%
|
3,021
|
|
Walnut Hills
|
24%
|
23%
|
21%
|
19%
|
-2%
|
-11%
|
-2%
|
-20%
|
1,449
|
|
Linwood
|
---
|
17%
|
22%
|
12%
|
---
|
24%
|
-9%
|
---
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUARTILE 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sedamsville -Riverside
|
14%
|
16%
|
20%
|
21%
|
18%
|
25%
|
1%
|
53%
|
446
|
|
East Price Hill
|
17%
|
15%
|
14%
|
11%
|
-12%
|
-7%
|
-3%
|
-34%
|
2,032
|
|
Evanston
|
14%
|
22%
|
24%
|
19%
|
53%
|
12%
|
-6%
|
32%
|
1,508
|
|
Corryville
|
17%
|
14%
|
14%
|
10%
|
-22%
|
3%
|
-4%
|
-45%
|
369
|
|
East End
|
13%
|
15%
|
16%
|
14%
|
14%
|
3%
|
-1%
|
7%
|
234
|
|
Mt. Auburn
|
12%
|
14%
|
13%
|
11%
|
22%
|
-7%
|
-2%
|
-8%
|
683
|
|
Bond Hill
|
22%
|
17%
|
20%
|
22%
|
-19%
|
15%
|
2%
|
1%
|
518
|
|
Northside
|
20%
|
19%
|
17%
|
13%
|
-5%
|
-13%
|
-4%
|
-37%
|
1,187
|
|
Winton Place
|
14%
|
15%
|
14%
|
8%
|
5%
|
-7%
|
-5%
|
-39%
|
203
|
|
Carthage
|
21%
|
23%
|
21%
|
17%
|
11%
|
-11%
|
-3%
|
-17%
|
419
|
|
Mt. Airy
|
12%
|
12%
|
13%
|
14%
|
2%
|
9%
|
0%
|
15%
|
1,238
|
|
Fairview - Clifton Heights
|
19%
|
15%
|
9%
|
6%
|
-21%
|
-40%
|
-2%
|
-65%
|
| |